<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Digging in the dirt</title>
	<atom:link href="http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/</link>
	<description>The never ending quest for a proper home for the Oakland Athletics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 15:57:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine Layer</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31087</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine Layer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 05:26:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31087</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BG - I don&#039;t see how you can flip an ongoing operating cost into a financing model. Neither team is going to be at the Coliseum for another 25 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BG &#8211; I don&#8217;t see how you can flip an ongoing operating cost into a financing model. Neither team is going to be at the Coliseum for another 25 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Grunwald</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31086</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Grunwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 04:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@ML--We are talking $100M that could be contributed to the Raiders and A&#039;s for their stadia. Very interesting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ML&#8211;We are talking $100M that could be contributed to the Raiders and A&#8217;s for their stadia. Very interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marine Layer</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31085</link>
		<dc:creator>Marine Layer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 01:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@BG - Not $250k annually. $250k per conversion. It&#039;s upwards of $1 million per year.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@BG &#8211; Not $250k annually. $250k per conversion. It&#8217;s upwards of $1 million per year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan Grunwald</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31084</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Grunwald</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2012 00:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31084</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[$250K in annual field conversion costs equates to a capitalized contribution of up to $25M towards new ballparks without having to raid the current net revenue. Capitalized value is the amount of principal you would need to have to earn $250K. You would need $25M if you desired a 10 percent return.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>$250K in annual field conversion costs equates to a capitalized contribution of up to $25M towards new ballparks without having to raid the current net revenue. Capitalized value is the amount of principal you would need to have to earn $250K. You would need $25M if you desired a 10 percent return.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31083</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 19:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31083</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dan from what I heard it sounds like they would become a traveling road team. But would see if they could get deal somewhere close temporarily.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dan from what I heard it sounds like they would become a traveling road team. But would see if they could get deal somewhere close temporarily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31082</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OT- Regarding the Santa Cruz tent arena possibly being stalled. I wonder what their back up plan is if they can&#039;t play in Santa Cruz this year...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OT- Regarding the Santa Cruz tent arena possibly being stalled. I wonder what their back up plan is if they can&#8217;t play in Santa Cruz this year&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31081</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:52:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31081</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ML, Qualcomm/Jack Murphy/San Diego Stadium also had a similar piece by piece conversion as well. But of course that&#039;s been locked in football configuration for over 8 years now. Oddly all 3 (Atlanta, Qualcomm, Coliseum) had or have grass.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ML, Qualcomm/Jack Murphy/San Diego Stadium also had a similar piece by piece conversion as well. But of course that&#8217;s been locked in football configuration for over 8 years now. Oddly all 3 (Atlanta, Qualcomm, Coliseum) had or have grass.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pjk</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31080</link>
		<dc:creator>pjk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 17:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31080</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[...just looked at the 2013 sked: Unless I&#039;m missing something, the A&#039;s only play the Giants 4 times, not six. One soldout home game gone from the schedule.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;just looked at the 2013 sked: Unless I&#8217;m missing something, the A&#8217;s only play the Giants 4 times, not six. One soldout home game gone from the schedule.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony D.</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31079</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony D.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31079</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Again, the city of Oakland should go all in with the Raiders, especially considering the Mt. Davis debt payments out to 2025.  Perhaps a naming rights partner can provide $300-500 million for another round of football-only renovations at the Coliseum for Da Raiders!
A&#039;s in San Jose and Raiders forever in Oakland...sweet!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Again, the city of Oakland should go all in with the Raiders, especially considering the Mt. Davis debt payments out to 2025.  Perhaps a naming rights partner can provide $300-500 million for another round of football-only renovations at the Coliseum for Da Raiders!<br />
A&#8217;s in San Jose and Raiders forever in Oakland&#8230;sweet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://newballpark.org/2012/09/11/digging-in-the-dirt/comment-page-1/#comment-31078</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2012 16:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newballpark.org/?p=8100#comment-31078</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of the circular cookie-cutter stadia had seats that were added in the end zones (Shea, Riverfront, RFK, Astrodome) that were not a part of the baseball configuration.  I&#039;m not sure where these seats came from, but I imagine they were added in a similar way as these, only on a smaller scale.

@Briggs, supposedly if there had been another year to build Mt. Davis (i.e. the Raiders could&#039;ve moved somewhere else for the 1996 season), they could have at least made the 100 level seats pull-outs, like a high school gym&#039;s seats (this was also done at the Metrodome).  So there would be no need for the cranes and all that.  I would think something like Mile High Stadium, where the entire section moves in for football and out for baseball, could&#039;ve made those seats not so crappy for baseball and more convertible.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the circular cookie-cutter stadia had seats that were added in the end zones (Shea, Riverfront, RFK, Astrodome) that were not a part of the baseball configuration.  I&#8217;m not sure where these seats came from, but I imagine they were added in a similar way as these, only on a smaller scale.</p>
<p>@Briggs, supposedly if there had been another year to build Mt. Davis (i.e. the Raiders could&#8217;ve moved somewhere else for the 1996 season), they could have at least made the 100 level seats pull-outs, like a high school gym&#8217;s seats (this was also done at the Metrodome).  So there would be no need for the cranes and all that.  I would think something like Mile High Stadium, where the entire section moves in for football and out for baseball, could&#8217;ve made those seats not so crappy for baseball and more convertible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
