Redevelopment bills keep moving after changes

Last week I wrote that redevelopment bill SB 286 (Wright) was stalled, with similar bill AB 1250 working the other house. Turns out that last Friday SB 286 was amended and brought to committee again. This time its language largely matches that of AB 1250, which should make it easier to get a unified plan through the legislature.

SB 286’s changes include the elimination of restrictions against sports facilities, just as AB 1250 didn’t contain such restrictions. Will Governor Brown maintain a hardline stance against redevelopment? Somewhat surprisingly, redevelopment has become something of a plank for Republicans in budget negotiations. Whether that’s simply to have a bargaining chip in place or actual support for the institution is something we’ll find out over the next few weeks. Then there’s the matter of the governor’s veto power, though I suspect that if a budget deal is done under Brown’s watch, he probably won’t be so intransigent as to create a budget crisis by killing one or more budget-compromise bills.

4 thoughts on “Redevelopment bills keep moving after changes

  1. So if either of these bills pass what will be the ultimate effect on the stadium search in San Jose or Oakland, if any?

    • @Dan – For Oakland it means that whatever chance there is for Oakland remains since redevelopment doesn’t die. For San Jose it means that all the work to protect the Diridon land was premature and unnecessary.

  2. Now if only Bud Selig would open his yap… I can’t believe I just typed that.

  3. My opinion is the Redevelopment lobby has the ear of Republicans and their support is legit.

Leave a reply to Jeffrey Cancel reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.