New Sacramento-based bidding group for Kings emerges

In what has to be considered a potential game changer, a Sacramento group wants to buy the Kings and build a privately-financed arena to keep the team in town. The kicker is that the group is headed by current Kings minority partner John Kehriotis, who owns 12.2% of the franchise. According to FOX 40 in Sacramento, the plan is to spend $750 million to buy the Kings and build an arena at either of the downtown sites or elsewhere in the region. The group claims that their plan won’t require any public money, such as the pledging of parking revenues from the 2012 arena plan.

This surprise news comes before the expected unveiling of the “whales” group which could contain Ron Burkle and/or Mark Mastrov. That’s supposed to happen towards the end of the week, when the league-imposed deadline for Sacramento to make a proposal (March 1) comes. The City-backed plan includes a public-private partnership on a downtown arena.

An unnamed source within the Kehriotis group explained that the group has $350 million in hand and a verbal commitment for the remaining $400 million. The key to the Kehriotis group’s bid is that Kehriotis, as a minority partner, has a right-of-first-refusal clause for any team sale. When this was revealed last month, it wasn’t clear that any of the minority partners would be able to put together the resources to put in a bid. If Kehriotis can pull this off, it could be the best and most politically easy way to keep the Kings in the capital. As big as $750 million, it’s well under the $1 billion Seattle and the Hansen-Ballmer group expected to put into Sonics 2.0. In addition, I’ve thought for some time that the cost estimates for a Sacramento were lowball, with the true cost of the arena approaching $500 million when completed.

The Kehriotis bid would also have to come under scrutiny first. The list of failed NBA team buyers is long and generally forgotten, and in a competitive situation, ROFR doesn’t necessarily mean the Kehriotis bid will be accepted. The group will undergo the same kind of vetting Hansen-Ballmer is getting, though Kehriotis’s status as a partner in the Kings should automatically generate some goodwill. The issue for the NBA will be the group’s ability to pull together all of its financing plan, which considering the size of the market, is extremely aggressive. It even contradicts a City staff report released Monday ahead of Tuesday’s city council meeting, which states that a fully private arena would not be “not economically viable” in Sacramento.

Unlike the NFL and MLB, there are a number of privately financed and owned arenas throughout the NBA, spanning both older venues (Madison Square Garden, The Palace of Auburn Hills, EnergySolutions Arena) to newer ones (Staples Center, Rose Garden). The Warriors plan to build their own privately financed arena with the league’s approval. If the Kehriotis group can make the numbers work, David Stern and the Board of Governors may see the arena as the path of least resistance. Both the Seattle arena plan and the main Sacramento plan involve large pledges of public money, which are subject to public review and referenda in all likelihood.

Ironically, the Kehriotis bid is sort of a double-edged sword for Sacramento, whose Mayor, Kevin Johnson, has been making the rounds and working the phones to put together a big bid of their own. With a public that is already predisposed to oppose a large public investment for an arena, citizens could easily look at Kehriotis and proclaim him the savior, rendering the “whales” bid and public arena investment unnecessary. There’s a delicate bit of negotiating at work here in that if both Sacramento groups’ ultimate goal is to keep the team in town without breaking the bank, one may have to step aside to avoid their own internal bidding war. Another possibility is the merging of groups to lighten the load, but if both have fundamentally different new arena plans and financing approaches, it may be difficult to come to a consensus. Besides, it’s a bit late to start merging plans.

Like the very hot Warriors sale situation in 2010, I would expect Stern and the BOG to simply pick the bid that works best for the league and the Maloofs. That means dollars, dollars, dollars. Stern will wake Tuesday morning to news of the Kehriotis bid, and I can’t imagine that he’ll be frowning about it.

6 thoughts on “New Sacramento-based bidding group for Kings emerges

  1. Is that the same John Kehriotis that was rumored a few weeks ago to be selling his 12% of the team to Hansen in addition to the 65% they’d already bought? The timing of this “leak” less than 24 hours before the Sac city council takes up the public arena issue again sure seems fishy. Especially given that Kehriotis isn’t generally thought to have enough money to actually do what he’s claiming. I’m not usually a conspiracy theorist, but something doesn’t smell right…

  2. Not to mention that this source at Channel 40 is Jim Crandell, who’s been so gloriously wrong on so many different arena proposals up here that his cred on reporting of arena issues up here is close to zilch.

  3. True Crandell broke it, but he’s not the only one reporting it now either. Seems there really are two plans afoot in Sac. But I stand by my massive concern over Kehriotis’ plan undermining KJ’s. Not to mention his financial questionability.

  4. Kevin Johnson and those same investors should also pony up to bring the Raiders and keep the Kings. Woulddn’t that be a money maker

  5. Football is not a money maker for the city hosting it.

  6. This is all smoke and mirrors, if Kehriotis truly had the money to buy the team he would have brought this up before the Maloofs entered a binding agreement with the Seattle group.

    The Maloofs are selling to Hansen-Ballmer because they are essentially league approved and have the dollars to back it up….This is public info.

    Kehriotis on the other hand is showing up at the eleventh hour trying to put something together to buy the team and build an arena that is not economically feasible when done privately?

    The NBA owners are going to vote for the move and here is why:

    1. Every team in the league gets a 30M dollar boost in value with a team in Seattle with a larger TV deal in a bigger market. Forget an arena being built that will help that figure more.

    2. The Warriors are building a new arena in SF and with a new TV deal emerging with the Kings gone it will push it over the top and become a reality.

    3. Hansen-Ballmer has the $$ and if the Maloofs felt the team could not be relocated easily or sold to them without a problem they would not have finished the deal with them.

    Sacramento is done, they failed years ago. Without a major public subsidy that is concrete (not imaginary parking revenue) the team was done from the get go.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.