“Better a diamond with a flaw than a pebble without.” – Confucius
There are any number of ways to rephrase the idiom above. Some might use “A bird in hand is worth two in the bush,” though the meaning is not the same. Voltaire coined the phrase a little more directly.
The perfect is the enemy of the good.
As I listened to Don Knauss make yet another sales pitch about the virtues of Howard Terminal (and Damon Bruce’s softball handling of it), I started to write a point-by-point rebuttal of everything he said. Then, thanks to BANG’s Matthew Artz, I read a 6-page letter from Lew Wolff to Oakland Interim City Administrator Henry Gardner. The letter outlined Wolff’s desire for a lease extension at the Coliseum before leading into the questions surrounding the future of the Coliseum.
Two pages of the letter are devoted to a section called “The Raiders”. Instead of pointing fingers at the Raiders or Mark Davis, Wolff mostly pans BayIG, the Coliseum City plan, and all of the work that has gone into it so far.
I contrasted words from both Knauss and Wolff. The Clorox CEO talked about a transformative project that could hugely benefit downtown Oakland, which it could. A similar description has been made about Coliseum City by its proponents, comparing it to LA Live among other developments. Then there was Wolff, going detail by detail about the process, the difficulty, tedium, and the obstacles. He even lashed back at “Negative Forces” agitating at every possible turn, which could be construed as a critique of Don Knauss or others allied with Knauss.
The argument, which has stretched as long as Wolff and John Fisher have owned the A’s, comes down to Voltaire’s quote. Wolff’s #1 job this entire time has been to get a ballpark. Let’s understand some of those efforts.
- 2003 – Wolff was hired by Steve Schott and Ken Hofmann to be the VP of Venue Development. During that brief tenure, Wolff proposed building in the Coliseum’s A Lot and at the Malibu/HomeBase lots. The A Lot option went nowhere because Schott was only willing to put up $100 million for the ballpark. The Malibu option was not available because it was not JPA-owned land. Eventually the JPA bought the land in order to assemble a larger complex for what would be become Coliseum City.
- 2005 – Wolff exercises an option to buy the team, phasing Schott & Hofmann out and bringing Fisher and numerous associates of Wolff in. Wolff soon proposes the Coliseum North (66th/High) plan, which would redevelop a large swath of industrial land north of the Coliseum complex into a ballpark and mixed-use (residential, retail, commercial) plan. The plan received great fanfare at first, but quickly died as numerous existing landowners showed no interest in selling.
- 2006 – The Fremont Baseball Village plan is proposed in south Fremont near the Santa Clara County line. A compromise plan of sorts, the idea was to court Silicon Valley corporate interests without crossing into the Giants-held territory of Santa Clara County. Again, there is great immediate enthusiasm, this time from Fremont city leaders. This time, a combination of the Great Recession and big box stores vetoing any developments they didn’t approve of killed the plan. Another attempt in 2010 was made to put the ballpark near the NUMMI (now Tesla) factory across the Nimitz. That was met with hostility from well-heeled residents on the other side of I-680 and fell apart quickly.
- 2009 – San Jose becomes the next plan, with a partially-acquired site downtown, major corporate and civic support, and a certified environmental impact report ready to go. Again the plan stalled as the Giants remained intransigent about their held territory. A lawsuit filed by people associated with the San Jose Giants (eventually a SF Giants-owned property) threatened the project and is still ongoing. The City of San Jose became frustrated and launched its own lawsuit in 2012 against MLB. That too is ongoing.
- 2009 – Let’s Go Oakland launches with support of three sites in downtown Oakland: Victory Court, JLS West, and Howard Terminal. Victory Court becomes the preferred site in 2010. LGO promoted Victory Court as much as possible, backed by local developers. No significant activity occurs in 2011, and by the beginning of 2012 the site is dead due to the death of redevelopment and spiraling site acquisition costs.
- 2012 – Not long after Victory Court goes away, murmurs about Howard Terminal becoming the new preferred (not by A’s ownership) Oakland site begin. In 2013, the Port of Oakland negotiates a settlement with SSA Terminals to vacate the site in order to consolidate facilities and kill a lawsuit against the Port. That allows the Port to look into non-maritime uses such as a ballpark, which it does in spring 2014. A new investor/support group, OWB (Oakland Waterfront Ballpark), emerges, led by Knauss and former Dreyer’s CEO T. Gary Rogers.
While Wolff has been trying to deal with the on-the-ground demands of planning and building a ballpark, many in Oakland have been fixated on grand concepts like Coliseum City and the far-off promises of Howard Terminal and Victory Court. Even yesterday, Knauss couldn’t help but bring San Francisco into the discussion, talking up how a HT ballpark would have better weather and views than AT&T Park. Coliseum City would be a transformative project that could attract Super Bowls and give Oakland new cachet.
Oakland’s desires to become something bigger and better are completely understandable. But they’ve been so pie-in-the-sky, so big, that there’s always been huge doubts about what, if anything, the City could pull off. I’ve mentioned before that Oakland has never built anything by itself, and that it needed the County and the business community to come together to make the Coliseum work nearly 50 years ago. That need hasn’t changed, but the sense of teamwork has. In Oakland’s attempt to keep all three teams in place, it has gotten away from what got them the teams in the first place: strong partnerships and sensitivity to the teams’ needs. Nowhere is that more evident than in Coliseum City, where the County is playing the realist role in questioning the project and in looking to the A’s, while the City brings in big names with no commitments, entirely footing the bill along the way.
Oakland keeps searching for the perfect project, the ultimate solution, the one that will finally vault them past the City beyond its rival across the Bay. Some politician(s) would take credit when it gets done, a legacy-defining moment. So they keep dreaming, keep hoping, clearly not worried about the little details that need to be addressed or the problems that arise when undertaking big projects. At some point, someone in Oakland will recognize that the dreams need to be tempered with what can realistically be done, and understand the work that will be required to get it done – establishing partnerships with the teams and stakeholders for starters. If not, the teams will get frustrated and give up. Those dreams will die. The biggest pro sports Oakland will be able to get will be minor league (which for some is okay). And the Coliseum, home of six world championships, will end up unused, even more unloved, and ultimately, something generic like a shopping center. That’s what happens when the well-intended keep pursuing the ever-elusive perfect instead of understanding that good is actually pretty great.
Lew Wolff is getting ready to offer what could be a pretty good deal. If Oakland wakes up, they may be able to react in time to take it.
P.S. – I’m removing comments from the site for the time being. It’s not because of the commenters or specific comments – although they can be especially inane at times – it’s because those comments and the constantly attacking spambots (which you don’t see) are causing heavy server load, for which I’ve been warned by my provider. I hope that by having no comments there will be less server load. Thanks for your patience.
so comments are removed? test..
Well I can read your comment.
New site looks good and it looks like the comments formatting got a big time upgrade.
The look is temporary. Comments are here to stay.
Good stuff, man. The effort you put in is much appreciated.
I like the layout and design, ML. If only you had a say in the unfolding drama the end result of the staduim saha would improve as well.
*stadium saga. Is there a feature for spell check in the comments?
Oh and are the Supervisors still on track to vote on the 29th?
I like the look here.
The changes look nice.
I like the fact we can reply directly to a reply now. I like the new changes, solid stuff.
As for the article itself. Oakland sides with the Raiders in any case over the A’s period and for that matter the Warriors.
Lew Wolff is actually the best bet for Oakland to retain a team and develop the Coliseum site.
The reason why Wolff is willing to look at it now is because the Warriors are leaving so they have no say, the Raiders have a glittering option 35 miles away on the cheap, and the economy in the Bay Area has improved with SF/SJ being so expensive housing wise a mixed use development could work at the Coliseum site.
Wolff sees this and figured why not hedge his bets? Plus his letter to the City Manager states Bud Selig is telling Wolff to keep trying in Oakland….Bud wants his “Oakland miracle”.
Oakland unfortunately will not “wake up” and see this is the path of least resistance for a new stadium on the site and the development.
Oakland thinks the Raiders, who do significantly more revenue than the Dubs and A’s are the logical choice.
I partially agree with Oakland on that one, as it would take massive revenue from the development with a new A’s stadium to match the revenue of a new Raiders stadium with the same development from a revenue/tax point of view.
But from a “logical” standpoint the Raiders stadium is far more expensive and Mark Davis refuses to raise money to bridge the gap.
If Davis was willing to raise money (350M or so) then this is over with, he needs to raise 30% of what Jed York did in Santa Clara….30%!! That is it……unreal. I could raise that money, hire me Mark Davis! I will raise 350M to get you your stadium, you sell a piece of the team for 150M and as the great Al Bundy would say “Let’s Rock”.
Wolff unlike Davis is willing to raise money and make the development pan out but he has to have control of the site. Wolff is a developer by trade, he is the one Oakland should put their bets on.
I think the A’s are going to sit on the lease for a while and see how San Jose’s lawsuit pans out in the coming 1-2 months. I believe they want to reject it now….But why not just sit on it and see what happens?
Okay, Mark Davis. What’s your next move?
That was my next question too. Does he continue to pursue a year extension at the Coliseum for 2015 or does he just bolt after this season.
Would like to know all the components of the $7M operating subsidy the Raiders receive. Sounds like a portion of that would continue through 2017 with free rent at their Alameda training facility—whatever he choses he has to weigh in that he plays in a place nearly rent-free and then they kick $7M back in subsidies–
Yeah, the deal that Davis has, comes out to nearly free plus kick back’s.