Just before 4 PM today, a fire broke out at the Schnitzer Steel metal recycling plant immediately to the west of Howard Terminal. This followed a similar fire in March, and other fires that have hit the facility over the last several years. Thankfully, the blaze came under control shortly after six, after help came from Alameda and San Francisco fireboats.
Great shot from Drone View 7 of @sffdpio fire boat dumping water on the recycling plant fire at Schnitzer Steel in West #Oakland. Fire under control. #abc7now pic.twitter.com/SrzzNKBzUA
— Katie Utehs (@KatieUtehs) June 3, 2018
A few shots from tonight’s big fire at Schmitzer Steel in West Oakland. Smoke could be seen all around the bay. Under control 6:17pm. No injuries. pic.twitter.com/oETBPNQNBU
— Mark Sayre (@MarkSayre) June 3, 2018
Schnitzer and the A’s met before the season started as the A’s renewed interest in Howard Terminal. Schnitzer clearly warned the A’s that if the A’s were to build there, either the metal plant or the team would be impacted because the plant’s operations have already changed to overnight hours to help reduce the impact during regular business hours. While this fire occurred on a Saturday afternoon, it could happen at any time as long as there’s a pile of scrap metal ready to ignite at the plant.
That brings up a serious conundrum that may face the City of Oakland, the Port of Oakland, and the A’s if the three parties decided to go forward with the Howard Terminal site. Would they have to figure out a way to get rid of Schnitzer? The company likes their location, with access to freeways, rail, and the waterfront for shipping to other countries. That’s pretty hard to beat as long as the company can comply with environmental regulations. The plant is overseen by an alphabet soup of public agencies. California’s DTSC (Department of Toxic Substances watches what gets leaked into the ground or bay. The BAAQMD (Bay Area Air Quality Management District) tries to make sure that toxics aren’t released into the air as they were today. Moving the plant to another location – in Oakland or elsewhere – would require drawing up new toxics control agreements and invite protests from potential neighbors.
We have a couple of test cases to guide us through the process. AT&T Park was made possible by the closure and decommissioning of the Embarcadero Freeway in San Francisco after Loma Prieta, which allowed the city to remake the entire waterfront from Mission Bay to Broadway. In Minneapolis, Target Field was placed on a site next to a plant that not only recycles, it actually burns garbage and creates energy in the process. That’s not the same as a metal recycling plant whose main job is to recycle steel from old cars and appliances. At HERC the burning is controlled. At Schnitzer, fires can occur without warning.
To support their cause, Schnitzer enlisted from former State Senate President and East Bay politico Dom Perata. While Perata has seen his image disgraced and his power diminished, I don’t doubt for second that he still has some weight to throw around and that Schnitzer will use it to make any negotiations difficult. The question is, does Oakland and the A’s want to venture down this road? Schnitzer’s problems have been well known, but it provides a useful service for area. What is to be done about it? What if a fire broke out during a night game next door? How do you protect the fans, or evacuate them safely? These are among the many questions the A’s will be considering over the next six months.
Or, as Dave Kaval wrote in a letter to Mayor Libby Schaaf in March:
Of course, significant uncertainty remains on how the various challenges for Howard Terminal can be satisfied.
One thing’s abundantly clear: We can no longer wish away Howard Terminal’s challenges.
—
Update 6/4 7:23 PM – ABC-7’s Laura Anthony has further clarification on the incident.
#DEVELOPING @OaklandFireDep says Saturday’s fire is the fifth at #Schnitzer Steel in the past 10 years. pic.twitter.com/PeD9ffJ7cA
— Laura Anthony (@LauraAnthony7) June 4, 2018
HT = DOA? Why is Schaaf still pushing this site for an A’s ballpark? Because no one else in their right mind would want it?
It’s hard to believe that the Fire Department and Schnitzer can’t find a way to safely conduct this business on the site. There must be regulations and best practices that would enable that. If not, then maybe the business is no longer appropriate for that area. And where is the Port in all of this — do they support a ballpark or some other non-industrial use of the HT site or do they continue to allow businesses with the potential for conflict, with or without a ballpark? Looks more and more to me that the Coliseum will be the solution.