It starts with this.
And ends (for now) with this.
These two stadia opened 42 years apart, yet bear a couple of important similarities. One that is fairly obvious when you compare the two pictures is that neither has an exterior façade. The other is that they were both designed by the engineering and architectural firm HNTB. Well, sort of. As I mentioned on Monday, Arrowhead Stadium’s original architects were Kivett and Myers. That firm was acquired by HNTB to form its sports practice in the late 70’s.
HNTB went on to do several football stadia in the 70’s and 80’s, including Giants Stadium and the Hoosier (RCA) Dome. Neither was known for being a great work of architecture, and both are now history. Until HNTB designed the Broncos’ new stadium, Sports Authority Field, it’s hard to point to any really striking sports architecture from the firm. More eye-catching examples have come in the form of minor league ballparks such as Raley Field and the twin Fifth Third Fields in Toledo and Dayton. Minor league ballparks don’t have nearly the scale and sense of mass as a pro football stadium, so it’s probably unwise to even compare.
While Arrowhead and neighbor Kauffman Stadium were highly acclaimed, notable pieces of sports architecture, they weren’t flawless. That lack of exterior façade made for cold and wet occupants, which was more of a problem at the ballpark during the spring months than at Arrowhead during the football season, when it’s customary to bundle up. The 2010 renovation of Kauffman included a large structure behind the seating bowl that provided a great deal of weather protection for fans.
At snowy Denver, there’s plenty of cover thanks to glass curtainwall. The undulating, horseshoe-shaped upper deck both saluted and riffed off the old Mile High Stadium. Even so, the most interesting thing about the new stadium is its all-steel structure, which wasn’t limited to columns and trusses. Risers that would normally be built of precast concrete were also made of steel, which allowed the Broncos to make an extra noisy, feet-stomping seating bowl much like Mile High.
New NFL stadia over the last 20 years seemed to be constant acts of one-upmanship. Paul Brown Stadium was thought to be overly garish for conservative Cincinnati. HKS-designed Lucas Oil Stadium looks like an Indiana field house enlarged by nuclear radiation, the same way a puffer fish might have become twice the size at the Bikini Atoll. Another HKS product, AT&T (Cowboys) Stadium, is practically out of a sci-fi film and as I noted while I was at Rangers Ballpark to the east, appears ready to destroy its neighbor with lasers. The next HKS design for the Vikings looks like a crystal football cathedral.
As domed multipurpose stadia, the three HKS designs had to have some sort of skin. The fact that they are a bit over-the-top (360 Architecture is guilty of this too) is part of the celebration of football, the fans, and the home city. The other recently built West Coast NFL stadium, CenturyLink Field in Seattle, was built to protect fans from harsh, wet winters. But in California, is any façade necessary? Or is it just ornamentation?
At Levi’s Stadium, most of the suites are set in a single 8-story tower along the west sideline. It’s efficient packaging for sure, though it looks a lot like of the office buildings in Silicon Valley, which are similar in scale. The other three-quarters of the stadium is practically naked. HNTB and the 49ers chose to show off the structural steel that lifts up and rings the bowl. Whether that’s “enough” architecturally to work as aesthetic is largely subject to individual taste. So far most of the comments I’ve seen are to the effect of, It’s nice on the inside. Levi’s Stadium is a technological tour-de-force, and like many good technologies that come out of the Valley, is built with headroom and expansion in mind. What it lacks at the moment is a single element that makes it beautiful, unless you consider the suite tower that element. Arrowhead has the lovely, swooping upper deck at the end zones. It adds elegance to what otherwise would be character-less and overly brawny. Perhaps the signature element, a translucent image-projecting, shape-shifting material that clads the exterior, simply hasn’t been invented. Or maybe Levi’s Stadium is destined to be like many of HNTB’s post-Arrowhead work: serviceable at best, forgettable at worst.
Let’s not forget that HNTB also designed Mount Davis. We know that aesthetic quite well, as our Oakland home is akin to a Supermax prison. HNTB is probably known more for their engineering work than their designs. They were hired by the City of Cupertino to do the lovely cable-stayed pedestrian bridge I mentioned in my “Rethinking Coliseum City…” post. They also designed the beautiful Zakim Bridge in Boston, along with a number of interchanges and airports. None of that sounds sexy, but they are important pieces of infrastructure that have to balance aesthetics and utility, not an easy task.
I suspect that Levi’s Stadium will undergo several minor and major revisions over the next 20 years as they iron out the rough spots and seek to enhance the experience even further. Levi’s Stadium is more than a place to watch football. It’s also a platform and brand. If there are bugs in 1.0, just wait for 1.1 or 2.0. It doesn’t get more Valley than that.
P.S. – This is not intended as a review. I’ll have one of those up in a month or so.
Hntb is really just a large engineering company, that just so happens to have a few architects. Recently in the Bay, they were the designer of the Devils Slide Tunnels. Currently they are the design group for the Doyle Drive reconstruction, and one of the worlds largest tunnels in Seattle. If I wanted to build something memorable, it wouldn’t be them
I went to Arrowhead in ’12 and was very impressed by the utility of the stadium. 78,000 and not a bad seat in the house, unlike many that have been built since (cough cough AT&T Stadium cough). I didn’t have time (or the interest) to go to the museum that was put in during the renovations, and the concourse was still crowded (I can’t believe that anyone could get around there when it was like this: () but it was accessible and comfortable. It’s kind of interesting that they not only put the first deck below the parking lot level a la the Coliseum but the first deck concourse as well (you walk down a ramp to the first deck concourse, and then down to the first deck of seats). Definitely saves you some climbing if you’re in the upper deck, but is also responsible for its less-than-impressive profile from the outside in the end zones (which is where you see it from most of the parking lot spaces)..
I’ll put it at the top of NFL stadiums I’ve visited, ahead of, in order, Houston, Minnesota (Metrodome), Oakland, San Diego, Dallas (AT&T), and Candlestick.
Correction: I can’t believe anyone could get around there when it was like this: http://ballparks.phanfare.com/5654022#imageID=161736582
didn’t hntb also do the oracle renovation across the way at the coliseum site?
design wise this firm doesn’t have a glowing resume though i’ve always liked investco field or what it’s called now sports authority in den.
funny you mentioned the bengals football stadium considering that’s almost the identical venue the 49ers wanted to build in the late 90s with the stadium/mall plan at the candlestick point located and i much would’ve preferred that design without the mall of course over the current design of levi’s stadium.
@ML – What’s your explanation of the Royal’s redo of their ballpark – the place appears to have a totally new look (better) – completely unrecognizable from the former ballpark – at a $170 mil. cost.
Also, how were the Astro’s able to build a new, good looking ballpark for $250 mil.- (low cost for an MLB ballpark with a retractable roof)
I wrote it up in 2010.
Good question about Enron/Minute Maid. That park came in at least $100 million under many other open air parks. And it was supposedly under the $250 million budget. I don’t know how that happened.
That so-called “new deal” for the Raiders – give them land and infrastructure, no money for stadium construction – looks very much like the old deal, the one the Raiders have not signed. The Raiders want someone to pay for a stadium for them. Good luck with that.
Kaplan says she saved the A’s for Oakland https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SI6VrtVUZaU&feature=youtu.be
Sorry, ML. I see you’ve already posted the Kaplan interview.
So what Oakland is saying is “&^(# you A’s” with Quan’s latest “plan”. Wolff was willing to work with them, but instead they’re going to go suck off the Raiders yet again. Only hope at this point is that the city and the county never seem to see eye to eye on anything, and it’s the city that seems hell bent on bending over for the Raiders. The county seemed far more interested in working with the A’s than the city does.
I hope something can be worked out between the A’s and the Raiders, although it’s looking increasingly like it’s an either or situation, hope it doesn’t come down to that, but if so, please let it be the A’s. I would rather not be such a sceptic, this looks like nothing but pure politics by Quan.
That’s funny, Kaplan is taking credit for saving the A’s (not that they have been saved), even though, she voted no on her own proposal. I think she even voted no on the revised proposal.