The Raiders are scheduled to play perhaps their last game ever in Oakland vs. the Broncos on Monday night. Already, Denver local news is sounding the alarm about the dangers that await Orange Crush in the Black Hole.
Oakland’s stadium set up could be a Christmas Eve concern for #Broncos https://t.co/D0nMfXj1Qx#9sports #WeAreBRONCOS pic.twitter.com/uZgjMU6tqq
— 9NEWS Sports Denver (@9NEWSSports) December 22, 2018
Stories about rough and lawless crowds for Raiders games at the Coliseum are the stuff of legend. Like most legends they tend to be either fictional or largely embellished. There have been incidents in the past, though, and for the final game in Oakland Raiders history, the Coli is likely to be quite lathered up for the occasion. I don’t blame fans if they do, save for violence.
To add insult to injury, the Raiders have started talks with the Giants to play the 2019 season at AT&T Park. It would only be a temporary stop as the Raiders await their palace under construction in Vegas. Still, the Raiders playing in SF has to be insulting for at least some Raider fans. Is it possible, though?
We’ve exhaustively covered MLB’s territorial rights here on this blog. Not so much coverage of the NFL’s T-rights. And yes, they do exist. There haven’t been many instances where NFL T-rights had to be defended, though the LA situation could have been trickier had only one team been there for an extended period when the other moved in. Historically, the NFL has been more prone to teams moving than expansion, with teams generally moving to new markets. That would make the NFL’s general by-laws about T-rights pretty straightforward:
“Home Territory” with respect to any club means the city in which such club is located and for which it holds a franchise and plays its home games and includes the surrounding territory to the extent of 75 miles in every direction from the exterior corporate limits of the city, except as follows:
I smell a catch coming…
(A) Whenever any two member clubs, other than the San Francisco 49ers and Oakland Raiders, are located and hold franchises for different cities within 100 miles of each other measured from the exterior corporate limits of the city, then the territorial rights of each of such clubs only extend to and include an area of one-half the distance between such cities.
In respect to the San Francisco and Oakland franchises the following provisions shall apply:
The home club in each city shall have the exclusive right to exhibit professional football games played by teams in the League in its city, and neither the San Francisco nor the Oakland club shall have any right to play professional football in the city of the other without the consent of the other club.
In respect to the area included in the home territory of both clubs, but located outside the city limits of both cities, both clubs shall have joint rights of exclusivity, and both of said clubs may play games with other clubs in the League within such area without the consent of the other club also operating in the same home territory or any part thereof.
No other two-team market is codified this way. In fact, the only other two-team NFL markets (NY and LA) either have a shared stadium or are building one. So it would appear that the Raiders need express permission from the 49ers to play in SF. That’s despite the fact that the 49ers don’t play their home games within SF city limits. The Bay Area is weird that way.
Whether the Raiders play at China Basin, East Oakland, or Timbuktu next year, the lawsuit filed by the City of Oakland against the NFL and the Raiders is likely to continue. To that, I look at it as every pile after a tackle – nobody knows where everyone’s hands have been.
If the Raiders play one down in 2019 in the 9-County area, I will be shocked. In my opinion, Raiders are going to be forced to play in Nevada.
I hope they are. Frankly, I don’t know why they weren’t kicked out the second they decided to move. No team says they are moving, then continues to play in their old metro for years afterward. They want Vegas that bad, go now. They can’t leave soon enough.
Regardless of where that traitorous franchise plays their games, that it won’t be the Coliseum is absolutely fantastic news for the A’s. No more having that beautiful field ruined every September. I am so happy about this. Almost as happy as the prospects of a new stadium.
It would be funny to have the Raiders actually playing in San Francisco, unlike the 49ers, who only pretend that they do. And have the Giants get their field torn up, instead of the A’s….FWIW, I don’t think the Oakland lawsuit has any merit. Oakland agreed to pay for $200 million in renovations in 1995 in return for the team staying 10 years. That condition has been met by the team, and then some. Oakland should have pursued a 50-year lease if they wanted the team to never have the option of leaving.