Pushback causes Howard Terminal to get pushed back

Saturday morning is not normally I time to check sites for updates. However, it was August 1, so there was a small chance of seeing something new. If you checked the A’s We Are Rooted site for Howard Terminal over the past several months, you were greeted with this graphic:

Old timeline

By June, it was becoming embarrassingly obvious that this graphic would need to be updated. So I sent out a tweet asking Dave Kaval for it. Ask and ye shall receive, as they say:

New timeline (8/1)

The differences? First of all, there’s no groundbreaking date in 2021 or 2023 Opening Day. In fact, neither is promised at all. What we’re left with are dual Oakland City Council and Port of Oakland votes a year from now, which at this point looks and sounds like a rapidly deflating balloon.

Second, the Draft EIR period is being undersold, as usual. That’s the period when opponents normally launch lawsuits against projects. The problem now is two-fold. While the A’s spent a lot of time and lobbying money trying to line up bills to streamline Howard Terminal through the CEQA process, the project is currently stuck in legal limbo while the state tries to figure out if the A’s successfully applied by the end-of-2019 deadline. It’s bad enough that there’s a protracted battle over the streamlining issue, where the A’s consultants keep submitting addenda to support the project while opponents file letters claiming that the project isn’t eligible.


Excerpt from Port companies letter against project (highlight mine)

Here’s the thing. I didn’t even want to write this post. When the sh*t hit the fan in March, I felt it would be best to let the dust settle and resume coverage when the EIR is released. Reasonable plan, right? Well, you know what they say about best-laid plans. Kaval says the EIR should be published by September. Which sounds okay, except that’s already a year delay from what was promised previously. At this point, we don’t really know when the document will be released. If past is prologue, I have to put the likelihood that we’ll see the draft version at 50/50.

Sadly, that’s all too typical of A’s ballpark projects since I started this blog 15 years ago. The EIR process, which for most people sounds like a tediously boring bureaucratic step, became a crucial gating mechanism for the viability of big projects. Last week, I tried to recall all of the sites beyond the Coliseum that the A’s have studied so far.

  1. Coliseum North (2006, no draft or final EIR)
  2. Pacific Commons (2008, no draft or final EIR)
  3. Warm Springs (2009, no draft or final EIR)
  4. San Jose (2010, EIR certified by City – who also was applicant)
  5. Laney/Peralta (2017, no draft or final EIR)
  6. Howard Terminal (2018, waiting for draft)

It doesn’t end with the draft, though. Publishing the draft kicks off the review and comment process, which opponents are already throwing a wrench into with their pre-emptive lawsuit. The 45-day comment period is a minimum guideline and tends to get drawn out as comments pile up and staff has to write responses or even make major or wholesale changes to the project.

This is why I cautioned so many readers and A’s fans against jumping on the HT bandwagon too eagerly. It, like most of the other past initiatives, is rife with conflict and litigious opponents. For now, I’ll continue to stay the course, hoping that the draft EIR is released and we’ll have something cool to talk about. Perhaps I’m asking too much. I’ll end with my favorite John Wooden quote:

Never mistake activity for achievement.

P.S. – When I first referred to the changed timelines yesterday, I got the usual blowback from HT fans who for some reason cannot comprehend why I’m not on the bandwagon. If those people can’t understand why from reading the post above, I can’t help them. Sorry, folks. Hope is not a strategy.

18 thoughts on “Pushback causes Howard Terminal to get pushed back

  1. Thanks for the update. That guy who’s attacking you on Twitter has no idea what “unbiased analysis” means.

  2. @ ML

    Thanks for the content.

    It was pretty obvious that things where getting pushed back even before the coronavirus, you may recal me asking your opinion about the delayed EIR as far back as last September. (I believe)

    As you know I am a big supporter of HT, it really would be nice to know if it is something they can/will do, so if not they turn to the coliseum.

  3. Without activity, there is no achievement.

  4. please A’s ownership…. ditch this unworkable idea ASAP and get a realistically plausible, easy to get to, and MUCH cheaper (hopefully resulting in lower ticket prices AND give you the extra money to actually build a team that we can recognize from year to year) and build at the current location.

  5. It appears the city is set to sell their portion of the Coliseum land to the A’s as well. It seems they will own the land outright soon.

    Does this change anything regarding Howard Terminal negations and development?


    • The Coliseum is tied to Howard Terminal because the former will help provide financing for the latter. If the A’s decide to nix Howard Terminal, financing for a new park at the Coliseum is structurally in place. In other words, they have a complicated, expensive option and a cheaper, more feasible option.

  6. Pingback: Albert Pujols won't blame the pandemic for not reaching 700 homers with the Angels - worldauthenticnews.com

  7. Pingback: Albert Pujols won't blame the pandemic if he doesn't reach 700 homers with Angels - Carihargater

  8. Pingback: Albert Pujols won’t blame the pandemic if he doesn’t reach 700 homers with Angels – Uefa Sport News, Scores, Standings, Rumors

  9. Pingback: All sports headline news network

  10. Pingback: Albert Pujols won’t blame the pandemic if he doesn’t reach 700 homers with Angels – e-News.US

  11. Pingback: Albert Pujols is OK with not reaching 700 homers with Angels – Golfing In The UK

  12. Pingback: Did Anaheim get a fair price for the Angel Stadium property? – e-Today.US

  13. Pingback: Did Anaheim get a fair price for the Angel Stadium property? – e-News.US

  14. Pingback: Did Anaheim get a fair price for the Angel Stadium property? – Maroc Sports News

  15. Pingback: Did Anaheim get a fair price for the Angel Stadium property? - TechFinGuy

  16. Pingback: Did Anaheim get a fair price for the Angel Stadium property? - a news room

  17. Pingback: Who is John Fisher? Billionaire A's owner won't talk, so we spoke to over 20 people in his orbit. - The News Motion

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.